^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KARTHIKEYAN K vs. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER TAMILNADU
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

R. Hemalatha

Res. Counsel

V. Prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	KARTHIKEYAN K
Respondent	THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER TAMILNADU
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 30, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 11877 of 2024 and W. M. P. Nos. 12966 & 12967 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10814
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER By this writ petition, order in relation to assessment period 2018-19 is challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand. 2. The petitioner received an intimation dated 07.09.2023. This was followed by a show cause notice dated 19.10.2023. Upon receipt of personal hearing notice dated 21.11.2023, the petitioner replied requesting for further time since a tax audit was being undertaken. Thereafter, upon receipt of personal hearing notice dated 05.12.2023, the petitioner replied requesting for 30 days' time on account of the ill health of the petitioner's father. The impugned order dated 09.02.2024 was issued in these facts and circumstances. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the petitioner's mail dated 01.02.2024 and pointed out that the petitioner had enclosed proof of the ill health of his father. In spite of such mail, she contends that the order impugned herein w....