Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

JAI VINDHYA UDYOG vs. STATE OF U.P. OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ BHATIA
Pet. Counsel
Anurag Mishra
Res. Counsel
C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant

JAI VINDHYA UDYOG
Respondent STATE OF U.P. OTHERS
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Oct 9, 2023
Order No.

WRIT TAX No. - 190 of 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8072
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, J. 1. Heard Shri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and perused the records produced by learned Standing Counsel in terms of the order passed by this Court on 03.10.2023. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 02.09.2023 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 107 of GST Act was dismissed as being beyond limitation. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 29.08.2022 passed by respondent no.3 whereby a demand has been created under Section of 73(9) of GST Act. 3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is a bonafide firm doing its business in accordance with law and claimed ITC. It is stated that a notice was served on 06.08.2021 intimating discrepancies in the return after scrutiny. 4. From the record, it appears that a show-cause notice under Section 73 of GST Act was sent to th....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).