^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

IHSEDU AGROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SONAK
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Prakash Shah

Jas Sanghavi

Shamik Gupte

Res. Counsel

S.r. Ketkar

Satyaprakash Sharma

Petitioner / Applicant	IHSEDU AGROCHEM PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Dec 14, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 36189 OF 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11870
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
P.C. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.):- 1. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the Order-in-Appeal dated 7 August 2024 passed by respondent No. 2, i.e. the Commissioner (Appeals-II). 3. The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Act (CGST Act) with respondent No. 2. The said appeal was heard by respondent No. 2. However, without giving any opportunity, the appellate authority dismissed the appeal on the ground that there is a delay in filing the appeal. The appellate authority further states that the board resolution authorizing Mr. Udeshi to sign the appeals has also not been filed, although the opportunity was granted on this issue to rectify the default. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent. 5. Admittedly, the ground....