^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

HINDUSTAN ORGANICS vs. THE STATE OF AP
(Andhra Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

DURGA PRASAD RAO
A.V. RAVINDRA BABU

Pet. Counsel

M.v.k. Moorthy

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	HINDUSTAN ORGANICS
Respondent	THE STATE OF AP
Court	Andhra Pradesh High Court
State	Andhra Pradesh
Date	Sep 15, 2023
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No.22588 of 2023
Citation	2023(9) TAXREPLY 8182
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO) Challenging the cancellation of Registration Certificate vide order dated 03.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Nandyal-I/ 2nd respondent, present Writ Petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri Dr.M.V.K. Moorthy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing the respondents. 3. Learned senior counsel submits that the 2nd respondent issued show cause notice dated 12.06.2023 alleging that the petitioner has committed fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts in terms of Section 29(2)(e) of CGST/SGST Act; alleged that the person issued invoices or bills without supply of goods or services or both in violation of the Rule 21(b) of the Act and also alleged that the petitioner avails ITC in violation of the provisions of Section 16 of the Act and also violated the provisions of Rules 86B and 21 (g), without furnishing their r....