Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

HARITHA STEELS vs. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Pet. Counsel
K.soundara Rajan
Res. Counsel
E.ranganayaki

Petitioner / Applicant

HARITHA STEELS

Respondent THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Oct 9, 2023
Order No.

W.P.No. 29238 of 2023 And W.M.P.No. 28842 of 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8450
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER With consent, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner, who is a dealer in Portland Cement and Iron ores, etc., was an assessee on the files of the respondent under the provisions of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter, referred to as 'TNGST Act'). The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the respondent dated 23.01.2023 for the AY 2019-20 whereby, the petitioner has been directed to pay a tax due of Rs. 5,54,429 along with penalty. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a registered dealer under the TNGST Act. Pursuant to a surprise inspection conducted by the Officials of the Intelligence Wing at the business premises of the petitioner, certain defects were found out and report was filed and based on the reports filed by the Officials of the Intelligence Wing, the respondent issued a show cause notice and the petitioner was not able t....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).