^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

HARIPA INDIA & ANOTHER vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX LYONS RANGE AND N.D. SARANI CHARGE, WBGST & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S. SIVAGNANAM
BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Pet. Counsel

Ankit Kanodia

Megha Agarwal

Piyush Khaitan

Res. Counsel

Anirban Ray

T.m. Siddique

Tanoy Chakraborty

Petitioner / Applicant	HARIPA INDIA & ANOTHER
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX LYONS RANGE AND N.D. SARANI CHARGE, WBGST & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Sep 24, 2024
Order No.	M. A. T. 1838 of 2024 With I. A. No. CAN 1 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11155
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. The appellants/petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Bench dated September 5, 2024 in W.P.A. 18230 of 2024 while granting an interim order and directing the appellants to secure the entire tax component as made under the adjudication order dated April 29, 2024 by furnishing a bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar General of this Court. 2. The appellants would contend that the chain of events will clearly show that the appellants had been promptly responding to all the show-cause notices and has submitted the documents in support of their claim. They also relied upon various decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as this Court. However, the adjudicating authority, without considering the reply given by the assessee, by a single line, has rejected the reply as not satisfactory and confirmed the demand made in the show-cause notice in Form GST DRC-01. This order has been pu....