^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GULSHAN KAPOOR vs. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ORS.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MANMOHAN
SANJEEV NARULA

Pet. Counsel

Shivashish Karnani

Arbind Aggarwal

Prashant

Res. Counsel

Prateek K. Chadha

Amit Bansal

Aman Rewaria

Petitioner / Applicant	GULSHAN KAPOOR
Respondent	COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ORS.
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Sep 30, 2020
Order No.	W.P. (C) 7037/2020 & CM APPL. 23996/2020
Citation	2020(9) TAXREPLY 3388
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 54

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging impugned Deficiency Memo dated 15th July, 2020 issued by respondent no. 4 for the period July 2018 to September 2018 as well as impugned Show Cause Notice dated 15th July, 2020 issued by respondent no. 3 qua refund application for the period October 2018 to December 2018 and impugned Refund Sanction Order dated 3rd September, 2020 issued by respondent no. 3 for the period January 2019 to March 2019 by crediting the refund claimed to the consumer welfare fund instead of the petitioner. Petitioner also prays for directions to the respondents to grant the refund of Input Tax Credit to the petitioner for all the three refund periods along with interest. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite all documents being available in the records of the respondents, they are asking for them to be furnished once again. He contends that a notice can be issued wh....