^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GOPAL NONDY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SOUTH BENGAL, KHARAGPUR ZONE & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Pet. Counsel

Arya Das

Amit Kumar Shaw

Res. Counsel

T.m. Siddiqui

Tanoy Chakraborty

Saptak Sanyal

Petitioner / Applicant	GOPAL NONDY
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION SOUTH BENGAL, KHARAGPUR ZONE & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Jun 13, 2024
Order No.	WPA 13141 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 9916
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J : 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the records. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 27th December 2023 passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the WBGST / CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. The petitioner is the proprietor of Arpan Enterprise and is registered under the provisions of the said Act. The petitioner claims to have received certain orders from M/s Apex Auto Private Limited having its place of business outside the State of West Bengal at Jamshedpur (hereinafter referred to as the “principal”) for executing certain job work in respect of certain “Railway Component” (hereinafter referred to as the “consignment”). Pursuant to and in furtherance of the aforesaid contract executed between the petitioner on one hand the said principal, the petitioner received 22 pi....