^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GEA WESTFALIA SEPARATOR INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
SANJAY VASHISTH

Pet. Counsel

Shubhangi Gupta

Priyanka Rathi

Ashwini Chandrasekaran

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	GEA WESTFALIA SEPARATOR INDIA PVT. LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
Court	Punjab and Haryana High Court
State	Punjab
Date	Aug 9, 2024
Order No.	CWP-19296-2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10553
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA , J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has assailed the order dated 05.04.2024, whereby, refund application of the petitioner was rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only one line order has been passed without any application of mind and without considering the reply filed by the petitioner. No reasons have been given for holding the reply to be unsatisfactory, and therefore, it is a case of nonapplication of mind. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also further submits that a similar writ petition i.e. CWP-16293-2024, titled as, “M/s Star Foods and Beverages vs. State of Punjab and others”, this Court has issued notice of motion and the said case also, there has been a complete non-application of mind while passing the impugned order, as the order does not give reasons. 4. Learned counsel also relies upon the judgment passed by the Delhi High Court in “Balaji Medical and Diagnostic Research Centr....