^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GAURSONS REALTECH PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MANMOHAN
SANJEEV NARULA

Pet. Counsel

Monish Panda

Mrinal Bharat Ram

Kshitiz Arya

Res. Counsel

Bhagvan Swarup Shukla

Shravan Kumar

Ravi Prakash

Petitioner / Applicant	GAURSONS REALTECH PVT. LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Oct 20, 2020
Order No.	W.P. (C) 5347/2020
Citation	2020(10) TAXREPLY 3432
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Rule 133

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
C.M.No. 26700/2020 1. The application has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking a stay on the operation of direction under Rule 133(4) of the CGST Rules given in the impugned order dated 07th July, 2020 to the respondent no.3 to undertake further investigation and the notice dated 09th October, 2020 as well as summons dated 25th September, 2020 both issued by the respondent no. 3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this Court stayed the penalty proceedings as well as investigation with regard to other projects of the petitioner vide order dated 5th October, 2020. 4. He further states that respondent no.3 vide notice dated 09th October, 2020 directed the applicant to answer the summons dated 25th September, 2020 and provide the information/ documents in respect of its project ‘16th&....