^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GAURESH INDUSTRIES vs. THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER HOSUR
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

Manoharan Sundaram

Res. Counsel

K.vasanthamala

Petitioner / Applicant	GAURESH INDUSTRIES
Respondent	THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER HOSUR
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 25, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 10783 of 2024, W. M. P. Nos. 11885 & 11888 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10839
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order dated 17.10.2023 is challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. Upon scrutiny of the petitioner's return, a notice in Form GST ASMT - 10 was issued on 08.03.2022. This was followed by an intimation dated 30.04.2022 and a show cause notice dated 11.07.2022. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of these proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter pertains to the discrepancy between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto populated GSTR 2A. He further submits that the petitioner has all relevant documents to explain the reasons for the mismatch. Therefore, he seeks an opportunity. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner is willing to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 3. Mrs. K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondent. With reference to the impugned order, she po....