Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GARG OIL TRADERS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
(Supreme Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

B.V. NAGARATHNA
UJJAL BHUYAN
Pet. Counsel
Siddhant Sharma
Yadwinder Singh
Alok Kothari
Res. Counsel
---

Petitioner / Applicant

GARG OIL TRADERS
Respondent STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Court

SC (Supreme Court)

Date Oct 20, 2023
Order No.

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO . 19535 OF 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8934
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Leave granted. Though respondent(s)/State is served, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent(s). This is for the third time. In the circumstances, we have heard only learned counsel for the appellant. Appellant’s counsel drew our attention to an order dated 21.08.2023 passed in CWP No. 17853/2023 by the very same Bench of the High Court, wherein a direction was issued to the petitioner therein to deposit 25% of the total amount by way of cash and for the remaining amount the petitioner could furnishing a personal/surety bond and on that basis a direction for release of the goods. He submitted that a similar order could have been passed in this case also. But, on the other hand, the direction is to pay Rs.4,00,000/- in cash and give security by way of Bank Guarantee with respect to the remaining amount out of Rs.19,42,692/-. He, therefore, submitted that order dated 21.08.2023 passed in CWP No. 17853 of 2023 may be passed in this case also. ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
1
Jul
S
M
T
W
T
F
S