^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GANGA SAGAR SINGH vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARUN BHANSALI
VIKAS BUDHWAR

Pet. Counsel

Puspender Prajapati

Vipin Kumar Kushwaha

Res. Counsel

Krishna Ji Shukla

Saurabh Pratap Singh

Petitioner / Applicant	GANGA SAGAR SINGH
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Nov 12, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1546 of 2024, 1554 of 2024
Citation	2024(11) TAXREPLY 11625
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to make payment of the difference in the rate of GST. 2. Submissions have been made that though at the time of grant of contract, the rate of GST was 12%, the same stood enhanced to 18%. While the petitioner has deposited the amount of GST, the same has not been reimbursed to the petitioner and, therefore, the respondents be directed to make payment of the difference GST. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that for the difference GST, Credit Cash Limit (CCL) has already been issued by respondent no.4-U.P. Rural Roads Development Agency to the concerned Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and that the payment is to be released by the said PIU. 4. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6-PIU submits that the requisite would be released to the petitioner in case the CCL has been received, as claimed by the counsel appearing for ....