^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GANESHI LAL AND SONS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF

Pet. Counsel

Aloke Kumar

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	GANESHI LAL AND SONS
Respondent	STATE OF UP AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 7, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 725 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9617
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated November 26, 2022 passed by the respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner State Tax, Sector-4, Gorakhpur under Section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and the appellate order dated February 19, 2024 passed by the respondent No.4/Additional Commissioner, Grade-2, (Appeal)-I, State Tax, Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that no opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the petitioner in the matter. He further submitted that in spite of seeking the Special Investigation Branch Report (hereinafter referred to ....