^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

GANAPATI ENTERPRISERS, ANGUL vs. STATE TAX OFFICER, ANGUL
(Orissa High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARINDAM SINHA
SAHOO

Pet. Counsel

Z.m. Wallace

Res. Counsel

S. Mishra

Petitioner / Applicant	GANAPATI ENTERPRISERS, ANGUL
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER, ANGUL
Court	Orissa High Court
State	Odisha
Date	Jan 7, 2025
Order No.	W. P. (C) No. 33112 of 2024
Citation	2025(1) TAXREPLY 12241
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER Order No. 01 1. Mrs. Wallace, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 3rd January, 2024 followed by order dated 27th February, 2024 cancelling her client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. She submits, her client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of her client to be accepted by the department. She relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). She submits, her client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order. 2. Mr. Mishra, learned advocate, Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the department. 3. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra). “2. In th....