^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

FASHION PLANET vs. SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GST & CENTRAL EXCISE THIRUVALLA & OTHERS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

GOPINATH P.
SYAM KUMAR V.M.

Pet. Counsel

Tomson T.emmanuel

Res. Counsel

Sreelal N Warrier

Petitioner / Applicant	FASHION PLANET
Respondent	SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GST & CENTRAL EXCISE THIRUVALLA & OTHERS
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	May 7, 2024
Order No.	WA NO. 642 OF 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 10782
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT GOPINATH P, J. The appellant had approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order. The learned Single Judge of this Court declined jurisdiction on the ground that the appellant has an appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST / SGST Acts. The grievance of the appellant is that the appellant is unable to upload an appeal though the appellant is still within time to file an appeal against Ext.P4 order in terms of the provisions contained in Section 107 of the CGST / SGST Acts. 2. Sri. Sreelal N Warrier, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that since the appellant is still within time to file an appeal against Ext.P4 order, the appeal can be disposed of permitting the appellant to prefer an appeal within the statutory period of limitation and further directing that if necessary, the portal shall be enabled to ensure that the appellant is able to file the statutory appeal. Having heard the learned counsel appearing f....