^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

FAMUS INDIA vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL

Pet. Counsel

Pranjal Shukla

Parth Goswami

Res. Counsel

Ravi Shanker Pandey

Petitioner / Applicant	FAMUS INDIA
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Mar 10, 2025
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 57 of 2021
Citation	2025(3) TAXREPLY 12666
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Mr. Parth Goswami along with Mr. Amit Kumar Yadav holding brief of Mr. Pranjal Shukla for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the respondent. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 8.9.2020 passed by Additional Commissioner, Grade - 2, (Appeal 1st), Commercial Tax, Meerut in Appeal No. 068 of 2019, under Section 129 (3) of UP G.S.T. Act for the assessment year 2019-20. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a registered firm having GSTIN No. 09AAAPF7319M1ZJ. He submits that in the normal course of business, the petitioner has placed an order from M/s R.G. Steels, Ghaziabad for 16.7 ton of iron steel in which bill no. 0140 dated 27.6.2019 was generated and the goods were transported with the vehicle having registration no. UP 77 N 8477 but on its onward journey from Ghaziabad to Meerut, the goods were intercepted on ....