^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

FABRICSHIP PVT. LTD. vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

K.R. SHRIRAM
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Ishaan Patkar

Alaksha Legal.

Res. Counsel

Anjani Kumar Singh

D.p. Singh.

Petitioner / Applicant	FABRICSHIP PVT. LTD.
Respondent	THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Jun 21, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5900 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5899 OF 2021
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10019
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 6

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (PER JITENDRA JAIN, J.) 1. Rule. By consent of the parties taken up for final hearing at the admission stage. Mr. Anjani Singh appearing for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4 and Ms. S. D. Vyas appearing for Respondent c and 3 waives service of notice. 2. These three petitions are disposed of by common order since the issues raised in all the three petitions are identical. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner challenges an Order dated 15 December 2020 along with the corrigendum dated 22 December 2020 passed by State GST Authority under Section 129 (1) of the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter “MGST Act”) levying penalty with regard to three consignments not being accompanied with e-way bill. During the course of hearing, the Petitioner has pressed only prayer clause (b). BRIEF UNDISPUTED FACTS : 3. Petitioner imported, at JNPT Port, certain machinery from China which were fully exempted ....