^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER GRADE-II (APPEAL) - 1& OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ALOK MATHUR

Pet. Counsel

Vikas Singh

Raja Babu Gupta

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent	ADDL. COMMISSIONER GRADE-II (APPEAL) - 1& OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jul 9, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 173 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10265
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vikas Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. The instant petition is being entertained by this Court in view of the fact that G.S.T. Tribunal is not functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh pursuant to the Gazette notification of the Central Government bearing number CG-DL-E-14092023-248743 dated 14.09.2023. 3. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 06.03.2024, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade-II (Appeal), Trade Tax, Mainpuri, thereby appeal of the petitioner has been rejected and penalty amounting to Rs. 1,22,760/- has been imposed upon the petitioner. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a registered dealer within the State of U.P. and is engaged in the business of trading of Electric Accumulators, including Separators, Lead Acid etc. The dispute in the....