Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

ENNKAY TIMBERS AND ANOTHER vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Pet. Counsel
Pragya Pandey
Res. Counsel
C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant

ENNKAY TIMBERS AND ANOTHER
Respondent STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Oct 11, 2023
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 1208 of 2022

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8077
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER HON’BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pragya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant Writ Tax is being entertained by this Court in view of the fact that G.S.T. Tribunal is not functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh pursuant to the Gazette notification of the Central Government bearing number CG-DL-E-14092023-248743 dated 14.09.2023. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have assailed the order dated 18.09.2021 by which the registration of the petitioner’s firm was cancelled and the same has been confirmed by order dated 4.8.2022 passed by respondent no.2 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner no.1. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the the petitioner no.2 is the sole proprietor of M/s Ennkay Timbers (petitioner no.1) and was allotted GSTIN No.09BZAPK7818J1Z0 under the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter refe....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
30
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).