^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

EASY INFRA INC. vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

GOPINATH P.

Pet. Counsel

---

Res. Counsel

Sreelal N.warrier

Jasmine M.m.

Petitioner / Applicant	EASY INFRA INC.
Respondent	THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Sep 24, 2024
Order No.	WP(C) NO. 18109 OF 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11110
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 161

☍

Notification No.11/2017 Central Tax

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this court challenging Ext.P3 order in original dated 27-12-2023. According to the petitioner the demand raised in Ext.P3 is unsustainable in law as the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of notification 11/2017-Central Tax dated 28-06-2017 where the construction of building for Government entities is entitled to a lower rate of tax. It is submitted that the notification has not been taken into consideration. It is also pointed out that the benefit of input tax credit has also not been granted to the petitioner. 2. The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Department would point out that the writ petition is not maintainable challenging the order in original. It is submitted that it is for the petitioner to seek alternative remedies if at all the petitioner has a case that the demands in Ext.P3 are not liable to be met. It is submitted that since the date of the order is 27-12-2023 the petitioner is out of time....