Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

EAP INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR vs. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER GOOD AND SERVICES TAX ACT (PREVIOUSLY CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS) , CHENNAITHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHENNAI, THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI AND THE CHAIRMAN GSTIN, NEW DELHI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
Pet. Counsel
C.sivasubramanian
Res. Counsel
V.sundareswaran

Petitioner / Applicant

EAP INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR

Respondent THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER GOOD AND SERVICES TAX ACT (PREVIOUSLY CENTRAL EXCISE AND CUSTOMS) , CHENNAITHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHENNAI, THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI AND THE CHAIRMAN GSTIN, NEW DELHI
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Sep 4, 2018
Order No.

W. P. No. 22941 of 2018

Citation

2018(9) TAXREPLY 2841

Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

Mr. V. Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel takes notice for the respondents 1, 3 & 4. Mr. M. Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader (Tax) for the second respondent. 2. The present writ petition is filed seeking mandamus directing the first respondent to enable the petitioner to file GST Tran-I declaration electronically and in accordance with law. 3. The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that in pursuant to the introduction of GST, certain input tax credit entitled to the petitioner, cannot be availed, in view of some lack of clarity in the new transition provisions under the GST Act. Therefore, it is contended that the petitioner finds it difficult in taking those credit, while giving effect to the transition provisions under the GST Act. 4. This Court has already considered similar grievance expressed by the similarly situated persons and disposed of those writ petitions on 21. 08. 2018 in W. P. Nos. 21321 to 21323 of 2018, by issui....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S