^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DYNAMED EQUIPMENTS vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , INTELLIGENCE - I, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

B.sivaraman

Res. Counsel

C.harsha Raj

Petitioner / Applicant	DYNAMED EQUIPMENTS
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , INTELLIGENCE - I, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 28, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 12722 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 13891 & 13892 of 2024
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10062
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 06.02.2024 in respect of assessment period 2020-2021 is challenged both on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits and on the ground that the impugned order travels beyond the scope of the show cause notice. An intimation dated 13.09.2023 was issued to the petitioner in respect of about eleven defects. This was followed by show cause notice dated 10.10.2023. The show cause notice also dealt with the above mentioned eleven defects in the detailed notice. The petitioner asserts that he was unable to participate in proceedings by responding to the above on account of his Accountant not informing him about the proceedings. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the show cause notice in Form DRC-01 and pointed out that the tax proposal is for an aggregate sum of Rs. 1,10,81,787/-. He points out that t....