^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DIAMONG CARGO MOVERS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER II, TUTICORIN.
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN

Pet. Counsel

S.karunakar

Res. Counsel

J.k.jayaselan

Petitioner / Applicant	DIAMONG CARGO MOVERS
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER II, TUTICORIN.
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 2, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (MD). No. 18462 of 2024 And W. M. P(MD)No. 15699 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 11151
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court as against the impugned order, dated 14.10.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18. By the impugned order, the demand proposed in show cause notice in DRC 01A, dated 06.04.2022 and DRC 01, dated 20.07.2023 have been confirmed. 2. The petitioner fails to take advantage of the show cause notices issued by the respondent before the impugned orders were passed. It is submitted that the petitioner's accountant had failed to inform the petitioner about the notices that preceded the impugned orders and also the impugned orders. Only after the department insisted on the petitioner paying disputed tax, the petitioner became aware of the impugned orders. 3. The above submission is opposed by the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, on the ground that the Writ Petition is hopelessly time barred and therefore, liable to be dismissed, on account of latches, in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble S....