^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DEV INDUS PAINTS REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR K. REVATHY vs. THE COMMISSIONER (CT) , COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT AND THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S.SIVAGNANAM

Pet. Counsel

P.suresh

Res. Counsel

J.kumaran

Petitioner / Applicant	DEV INDUS PAINTS REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR K. REVATHY
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER (CT) , COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT AND THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 9, 2018
Order No.	Writ Petition No.17029 of 2018 & WMP.No.20280 of 2018
Citation	2018(7) TAXREPLY 2904
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Mr.J.Kumaran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has challenged a show cause notice dated 16.1.2018 and the consequential attachment of the bank account for recovery of tax and penalty in the assessment orders for the years from 2015-16 to 2017- 18. 3. The first contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no assessment order has been passed and communicated to the petitioner so far as the three relevant assessment years are concerned and that the last assessment, which was made, was only for the year 2014-15. 4. Other contentions have also been raised with regard to the validity of the impugned notice invoking the provisions of the Puducherry Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 5. However, this Court considered the first ground and directed the learned Government Advocate....