^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DANIELI INDIA LIMITED vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

APARESH KUMAR SINGH
DEEPAK ROSHAN

Pet. Counsel

M.s. Mittal

Salona Mittal

Res. Counsel

P.a.s. Pati

Petitioner / Applicant	DANIELI INDIA LIMITED
Respondent	THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Jun 29, 2022
Order No.	W.P.(T) No. 2517 of 2022
Citation	2022(6) TAXREPLY 5986
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
2. Though multiple prayers have been made by the petitioner but learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has confined to the prayer seeking quashing of the appellate order dated 06.08.2019(Annexure-12) to the extent that it has dismissed the appeal only the ground of nonpayment of pre-deposit by the petitioner. Petitioner would seek rehearing of the appeal on merits, if it is restored. 3. A plea has been taken by the petitioner that on account of blocking of the electronic credit ledger of the petitioner on 09.10.2018, a total amount of Rs.1.83 Crore approximately was within the hands of the State exchequer, as such, the appeal ought not to have been dismissed on the grounds of non-payment of pre-deposit to the tune of 10% of the tax dues. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that electronic credit ledger of the petitioner has since been unblocked. However, he submits that petitioner is ready to make the pre-deposit of the 10% of the amount and the appeal is restor....