^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

CUTHBERT OCEANS LLP vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST RANGE 109 DIVISION ROHINI
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
AMIT MAHAJAN

Pet. Counsel

Tarun Gulati

Tarun Chawla

Res. Counsel

Harpreet Singh

Suhani Mathur

Jatin Kumar Gaur

Petitioner / Applicant	CUTHBERT OCEANS LLP
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST RANGE 109 DIVISION ROHINI
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Aug 8, 2023
Order No.	W.P.(C) 10421/2023 & CM APPL. 40335/2023
Citation	2023(8) TAXREPLY 7736
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. 1. Issue notice. 2. Mr. Harpreet Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the show-cause notice dated 09.05.2023 (hereafter ‘the impugned show-cause notice’) calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why its registration should not be cancelled, as well as the order dated 29.05.2023 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’) passed pursuant to the impugned show-cause notice. 4. The respondent issued the impugned show-cause notice proposing to cancel the petitioner’s registration for the following reasons: “Section 29(2)(e)-registration obtained by means of fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts” 5. Apart from the aforesaid reason, the impugned show-cause notice did not disclose any other reason or particulars for proposing the adverse action against the petitioner. The petitioner was called upon....