^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

COSYN LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX; BOWBAZAR CHARGE & ORS.
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S. SIVAGNANAM
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Pet. Counsel

Karan Talwar

Anupa Banerjee.

Res. Counsel

Rahul Dhanuka

Niraj Baheti.

Petitioner / Applicant	COSYN LIMITED
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX; BOWBAZAR CHARGE & ORS.
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Apr 30, 2024
Order No.	M. A. T. 2411 of 2023 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2023
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 9581
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 18

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. This intra-Court is directed against the order dated 4th December, 2023 in W.P.A. 25725 of 2023, by which the writ petition, which was filed by the appellant challenging an assessment order passed under the W.B.G.S.T. Act, was dismissed on the ground that it is an appealable order. When the appeal was heard on 22nd December, 2023, the impugned assessment order in the writ petition was stayed subject to the condition that the appellant/assessee deposits 10% of the disputed tax within a time frame, which condition has been complied with. 2. Subsequently, the matter was heard at length and on 2nd April, 2024 the following order was passed:- 1. “We have heard the learned advocates for the parties. 2. The State/respondents have filed their affidavit-in-opposition and the affidavit-in-reply has already been filed by the appellant. 3. It is pointed out by Mr. Talwar, learned advocate appearing for the appellant that the spec....