^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

CHINA PETROLEUM PIPELINE BUREAU INDIA (P) LTD & OTHER vs. THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, TAMILNADU
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

Thriyambak J Kannan

Res. Counsel

T.n.c. Kaushik

Petitioner / Applicant	CHINA PETROLEUM PIPELINE BUREAU INDIA (P) LTD & OTHER
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, TAMILNADU
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 30, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 11625 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 12716 & 12717 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10054
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order dated 30.12.2023 is assailed on the ground that such order is non-speaking and that a personal hearing was not provided to the petitioner. 2. Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner by issuing a show cause notice 07.09.2023. The petitioner's replied thereto on 04.10.2023 by enclosing documents. In response to reminder notice dated 30.11.2023, the petitioner replied on 07.12.2023. The impugned order was issued in these circumstances. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the impugned order and pointed out that the petitioner's reply was referred to therein, but the order does not contain any discussion of the petitioner's reply or record reasons for rejecting the same. He also submits that a personal hearing was not provided. 4. Mr. T.N.C. Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent. By referring to the impugned order, he points out that about eight documents were reques....