^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

CHIKKI COSMETIC BUDHANPUR AND ANOTHER vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL

Pet. Counsel

Syed Mohd Khalid

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	CHIKKI COSMETIC BUDHANPUR AND ANOTHER
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Sep 23, 2024
Order No.	WRIT TAX No. - 1293 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11344
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioners are, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- "i. Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to qauash the order dated 25.6.2024 and 19.1.2023 passed by reespondent no. 2 (Annexure 1 and 2 to this writ petition)." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners are doing the business of cosmetic for which they have obtained the GSTIN No. 09BSJPG9310F2ZQ, which has been cancelled on certain ground vide order dated 28.12.2022 passed by respondent no. 2 and when the order was served upon the petitioner, he has moved a revocation application on 7.1.2023 but the same has also been rejected vide order dated 19.1.2023. He further submits that being aggrieved to the said order, the petitioners have preferred an appeal, which has been dismissed as time barred vide order dated 25.6.2024.....