^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

CHANDRA KISHOR SINGH GOVT. CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL ORDER SUPPLIER vs. THE DIRECTOR, CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES UP JAL NIGAM AND 4 OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ MITHAL
SARAL SRIVASTAVA

Pet. Counsel

Shailesh Kumar Shukla

Sheo Kinkar Singh

Res. Counsel

Pranjal Mehrotra

Petitioner / Applicant	CHANDRA KISHOR SINGH GOVT. CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL ORDER SUPPLIER
Respondent	THE DIRECTOR, CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN SERVICES UP JAL NIGAM AND 4 OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Aug 21, 2018
Order No.	WRIT TAX No. 1159 of 2018
Citation	2018(8) TAXREPLY 2888
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
ORDER The petitioner is a contractor who has been granted a contract for construction of 100 Boys' Hostel GIC, Pratapgarh by the Construction and Design Services U.P. Jal Nigam, respondent no.4. The parties have entered into an agreement for the above purpose. A dispute has arisen between the parties to the contract as to who is liable to pay GST on the value of the construction work done under the contract. The petitioner alleges that the liability to pay the GST is upon the respondents and not upon it. The aforesaid dispute is one concerning the agreement between the petitioner and the respondents, which vide Clause 24 provides for resolution of such disputes by Arbitration. In view of the aforesaid remedy available to the petitioner for seeking an arbitration, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. ....