^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BVM TRANS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT) BENGALURU & OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Veenakamath

Res. Counsel

Hemakumar K

Petitioner / Applicant	BVM TRANS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT) BENGALURU & OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Sep 10, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 20966 OF 2024 (T-RES)
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11009
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: "a) Set aside the impugned proceedings dated 21.05.2024 of the 3rd respondent under Section 108 (1) of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017 at Annexure-A by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other order in the nature of a writ of certiorari; b) Grant any other relief in favour of the petitioner that this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case." 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material on record. 3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that pursuant to the Order of Detention dated 16.11.2023, passed by respondent No. 1 under Section 129 (1) of the KGST Act, 2017, the petitioner filed a detailed reply dated 22.11.2023 and further submission on 01.12.2023, which were rejected by order dated 02.12.2023 passed by respondent No. 1 under Section 129 of the KGST Act. Subsequently, vide ....