Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH vs. STATE OF U.P.
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIVEK CHAUDHARY
MANISH KUMAR
Pet. Counsel
Anurag Mishra
Res. Counsel
C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant

BRIJESH KUMAR SINGH

Respondent STATE OF U.P.
Court Allahabad High Court
State

Uttar Pradesh

Date Oct 9, 2023
Order No.

Writ Tax No. - 200 of 2023

Citation

2023(10) TAXREPLY 8056
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State respondents. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 06.12.2022 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1,Raebareli for the tax period 2018-19, whereby demand in excess to Rs. 27,23,636/- has been raised against the present petitioner. 3. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on 28.09.2022 seeking his reply within 30 days. Referring to item no. 3 of the table appended to that notice, it has been pointed out, the Assessing Authority had at that stage itself chosen to not give any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by mentioning "NA" against column description "Date of personal hearing". Similar endorsements were made against the columns for "Time of personal hearing" and "Venue where personal hearing will be held". T....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
29
Jun
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Jun

☑ Annual | GSTR-4

GSTR-4 (Annual Return) for FY 2024-25 by Composite Taxpayer (Rule 62).