Login | Register

Dynamic Website Plans

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

BLASTO METAL SPRAY PROCESSORS vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF GST AND CE, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Pet. Counsel
P. Gowtham
Res. Counsel
K.s. Ramaswamy

Petitioner / Applicant

BLASTO METAL SPRAY PROCESSORS

Respondent SUPERINTENDENT OF GST AND CE, CHENNAI
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Jan 3, 2025
Order No.

W. P. No. 39662 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 42951and 42953 of 2024

Citation

2025(1) TAXREPLY 12311

Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned Order-in- Original 04/2022-GST passed by the respondent dated 19.12.2022. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of machining and surface treatment for windmill components and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, an investigation was initiated by the Headquarters' Preventive Unit after receiving an Alert Notice from Chennai North Commissionerate regarding passing of Input Tax Credit on the strength of the fake invoices without supply of goods by a fictitious supplier viz., M/s.Mahendra Enterprises. On investigation, it was noticed that the petitioner had allegedly availed Input Tax Credit in respect of invoices issued by the above said M/s.Mahendra Enterprises and also M/s Vijay Lakshmi Industries. 2.1. Pursuant thereto, summons were issued to the petitioner followed by a Sho....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
4
Jul
S
M
T
W
T
F
S