^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BINSAR AUTOMOBILES vs. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II/AVATO, WARD 204, ZONE 11, DELHI & ANOTHER
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU
SACHIN DATTA

Pet. Counsel

Puneet Rai

Sanjay Sharma

Res. Counsel

Aviskar Singhvi

Vivek Kr Singh

Petitioner / Applicant	BINSAR AUTOMOBILES
Respondent	SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II/AVATO, WARD 204, ZONE 11, DELHI & ANOTHER
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Sep 6, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 11308/2024 & CM APPL. 46860/2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 10976
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 09.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the IGST Act), the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the SGST Act) for the tax period from April 2018 to March 2019. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that the said order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as the petitioner did not receive the Show Cause Notices dated 08.12.2023 and 17.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCNs), pursuant to which the impugned order was passed. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned SCNs were projected on the portal under the tab ‘Additional Notices and Orders’ and therefore, the petitioner had no reason to access the same. 4. The learned counsel for the responde....