Login | Register

Dynamic Website Plans

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

BHOOPAL DUTT vs. COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
(Uttarakhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PANKAJ PUROHIT
Pet. Counsel
Ashish Agarwal
Tarun Pande
Res. Counsel
Mohit Maulekhi

Petitioner / Applicant

BHOOPAL DUTT

Respondent COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
Court Uttarakhand High Court
State

Uttarakhand

Date Nov 11, 2024
Order No.

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3029 of 2024

Citation

2024(11) TAXREPLY 12121

Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav โ˜†
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :
โ˜

Section 30


TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is a proprietorship firm, who deals with works contract. Petitioner is registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short โ€œthe CGST Act, 2017โ€). 3. The registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by respondent no.2 vide order dated 23.06.2023 for non filing of the GST return for a continuous period of six months. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that now the petitioner is ready to make the payment towards GST returns for a period of six months as well as the penalty and interest, if any, imposed by the respondent-department. 5. Petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- โ€œi. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling the record of the case and quash the cancellation of GST Registration order dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure No.1 to W.P) as petitioner is ready to pay all the balance tax, interest on it and late fe....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
4
Jul
S
M
T
W
T
F
S