^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED, BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Andhra Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Tarun Gulati

Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi

Res. Counsel

N. Harinath

Y.n. Vivekananda

Suresh Kumar Routhu

Petitioner / Applicant	BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED, BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA
Court	Andhra Pradesh High Court
State	Andhra Pradesh
Date	Mar 16, 2021
Order No.	WRIT PETITION Nos.24826 and 24904 of 2020
Citation	2021(3) TAXREPLY 4023
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 16

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
We have heard Mr. Tarun Gulati, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Nikhil Gupta, representing Mr. Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi – learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. N. Harinath, learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondents 1 and 3, Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader attached to the Office of the learned Additional Advocate General-II for respondents 2, 5 and 6 and Mr. Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned standing counsel for respondent No.4. 2. In these two Writ Petitions, one filed by Bharti Airtel Limited and the other by Bharti Telemedia Limited, the petitioners challenged Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 as ultra vires and unconstitutional. Challenge is also made to separate orders, both dated 16.11.2020, passed by respondent No.6, whereby assessment of the amount of ₹ 11,44,83,005/- (W.P.No.24826 of 2020) and ₹ 47,48,748/- (W.P.No.24904 of 2020) was confirmed and the petitioners were directed to pay the sa....