^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BHARDWAJ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LTD. vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ARUN KUMAR RAI

Pet. Counsel

P.a.s. Pati

Res. Counsel

Ashok Kr. Yadav

Aditya Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	BHARDWAJ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (P) LTD.
Respondent	THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Jul 24, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (T) No. 3440 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11200
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. The writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India where by and whereunder the direction has been sought for upon the concerned Department of the State, i.e., Water Resources Department, for reimbursement of 8% of the value of work done by the petitioner (every month or periodically) after 01.07.2017 in favour of the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to remit such amount towards GST liability. 2. Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, at the outset, has submitted that although such claim has already been considered and rejected by the respondent authority but the Government subsequent thereto, has taken a policy decision by coming out with Standard Operating Procedure with respect to the issue which is the subject matter of the present writ petition. 3. It has further been contended that the issue has already been decided by the Coordinate Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 12.10.2022 passed in W.P.(....