^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BHANSALI INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Bombay High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SONAK
JITENDRA JAIN

Pet. Counsel

Bharat Raichandani

Mahesh Raichandani

Res. Counsel

S D Vyas

P N Diwan

Petitioner / Applicant	BHANSALI INDUSTRIES
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Bombay High Court
State	Maharashtra
Date	Oct 15, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION NO. 15331 OF 2023
Citation	2024(10) TAXREPLY 11260
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER M. S. SONAK, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner challenges the following:- (i) The adjudication order dated 03 July 2023 made by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Pune (Respondent No. 4); and (ii) The order dated 06 July 2022 blocking the Petitioner's credit ledger. 4. The challenge to show cause notice dated 04 August 2022 was correctly not pressed before us. Similarly, Mr. Raichandani, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, submitted that the challenge to the order dated 06 July 2022 need not be decided because the Petitioner’s credit ledger has been unblocked by now. Therefore, the challenge is to the impugned order dated 03 July 2023 made by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Respondent No. 4). 5. The record shows that the Petitioner, after receiving th....