^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BHANDARI STEELS LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

R. Swarnavel

Res. Counsel

T.n.c. Kaushik

Petitioner / Applicant	BHANDARI STEELS LIMITED
Respondent	THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 25, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 10753 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 11837 & 11838 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 9504
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 28.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition. Proceedings were initiated against the petitioner by issuing show cause notice dated 19.04.2023. Such show cause notice was replied to on 12.06.2023 and the impugned order was issued thereafter on 28.12.2023. The present writ petition was filed after filing an application for rectification of the order in original. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings in respect of all alleged discrepancies except two discrepancies were dropped under the order in original. As regards the two discrepancies in respect of which the tax proposal was confirmed, he submits that the petitioner was unable to submit relevant documents at that juncture. By referring to the rectification application, he points out that the statement of reconciliation of the difference in turnover as between the profit and loss account and the GSTR 2A and the reconciled difference in turnover between the GSTR 9 and....