^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LTD vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
DONADI RAMESH

Pet. Counsel

Shubham Agrawal

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	BGR ENERGY SYSTEMS LTD
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jul 29, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1026 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10349
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ankur Agrawal, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 26.04.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 under Section 73 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. 2. Undeniably the petitioner was issued show cause notice dated 10.04.2024 fixing the date 15.04.2024. It is admitted to the respondent- adjudicating authority that the petitioner submitted partial reply to that notice, dated 12.04.2024. In that it was clearly informed that at that stage the petitioner corporation was undergoing a process of resolution before the Interim Resolution Profession (IRP in short) which has been appointed. Therefore the petitioner informed respondent- adjudicating authority the need to issue appropriate notice and to grant the petitioner time to seek permission of the IRP to contest the adjudication proceedings. 3. No further notice was issued or date was fixed in the adjudi....