^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BANARAS INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

PIYUSH AGRAWAL

Pet. Counsel

Aditya Gupta

Harsh Vardhan Gupta

Res. Counsel

A.s.g.i.

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	BANARAS INDUSTRIES
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Aug 7, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1233 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10425
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 12

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Parcha filed by Shri K.J. Shukla on behalf of the Union of India is also taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents and learned counsel for the Union of India. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 11.05.2022 passed by the respondent no. 5 under section 130 read with section 122 of the UPGST Act as well as the impugned order dated 10.04.2023 passed by the first appellate authority, the respondent no. 4. 4. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being decided finally without calling for the counter affidavit. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a partnership firm and is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of iron and steel (ingot, patri, chann....