Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

AYURVEDA YOGA VILLA vs. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, WAYANAD AND STATE TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF STATE TAX OFFICER, MANATHAVADY
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.K.ABDUL REHIM
R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
Pet. Counsel
A.kumar
P.j.anilkumar
P.s.sree Prasad
Res. Counsel
Mohammed Rafiq

Petitioner / Applicant

AYURVEDA YOGA VILLA
Respondent STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, WAYANAD AND STATE TAX OFFICER, OFFICE OF STATE TAX OFFICER, MANATHAVADY
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Jun 11, 2019
Order No.

WA. No. 1141 of 2019

Citation

2019(6) TAXREPLY 2182
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The petitioner in WP(C) No.41831/2018 is in appeal challenging dismissal of the writ petition. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. Ext.P3 order of assessment with respect to the year 2014-15 was challenged in the writ petition mainly contending that tax imposed against sale of medicine in the course of treatment done at the appellant's hospital, is bad and unsustainable in view of the settled legal position. Inter alia, the appellant challenged the constitutional validity of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act (KSGST Act) and thereby the sustainability of the impugned assessment. 3. The writ petition was dismissed along with a batch of other cases by holding that the issue involved stands squarely covered against the appellant through the judgment in WP(C) No. 11335/2018 and connected cases, dated 11.01.2019. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant pointed out that, the issue covered by the judgment in WP(C) No. 1133....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).