^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

AXRECYCLE PRIVATE LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MOBILE AQUAD AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF

Pet. Counsel

Pooja Talwar

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	AXRECYCLE PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MOBILE AQUAD AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 7, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 712 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9608
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated December 22, 2021 passed under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") levying penalty upon the petitioner and the subsequent appellate order dated January 20, 2022 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner. 3. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that the only controversy involved in the present petition is with regard to non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill. The undisputed facts are that firstly the invoice in fact had the details of the truck that was carrying the goods; secondly, the goods were not in variance with the invoice; and thirdly, the....