^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ATR MALLEABLE CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS vs. INSPECTOR OF CENTRAL TAXES & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

T.S. SIVAGNANAM
HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA

Pet. Counsel

Pranit Bag

Rita Mukherjee

Ghanshyam Jha

Res. Counsel

Ranjan Kumar Sinha

Shaunak Ghosh

K. K. Maiti

Petitioner / Applicant	ATR MALLEABLE CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS
Respondent	INSPECTOR OF CENTRAL TAXES & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Jun 25, 2024
Order No.	M. A. T. 1285 of 2023 With I. A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Citation	2024(6) TAXREPLY 10011
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Rule 142

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. This intra-Court appeal by the unsuccessful writ petitioners is directed against the order dated 14th June, 2023 in W.P.A. 11167 of 2023. The main relief sought for in the writ petition was to refund a sum of Rs. 30,00,000/-, which the appellants would allege was forced to be paid by them under the threat of arrest, coercion and undue influence on 22nd March, 2023. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the allegation made by the appellants that there was no proper authorization in INS-01 was a false statement since the revenue, during the course of argument, had produced a copy of the INS-01 dated 12th June, 2023. Therefore, the Court was not inclined to entertain the writ petition. 2. Aggrieved by such order, the appellants have filed the present appeal. 3. We have heard Mr. Pranit Bag, learned advocate appearing for the appellants, Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India and Mr. K. K.....