^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ASIATIC CLINICAL RESEARCH PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Karnataka High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

Pet. Counsel

Ravi Raghavan

Sudeshna Banerjee

Res. Counsel

Jeevan J.neeralgi

Petitioner / Applicant	ASIATIC CLINICAL RESEARCH PVT. LTD.
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Karnataka High Court
State	Karnataka
Date	Feb 24, 2021
Order No.	Writ Petition No.13633/2020 (T-RES) C/W Writ Petition No.3384/2021, Writ Petition No.12555/2020
Citation	2021(2) TAXREPLY 3921
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 54

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the refund rejection orders. Noticing that W.P.No.13633/2020 relates to rejection of refund order as regards October, 2018; W.P.No.12555/2020 relates to rejection of refund orders for the months of April, 2018 to September, 2018; W.P.No.3384/2021 relates to rejection of refund orders for the months of November, 2018 and December, 2018 and noticing that the rejection of refund orders relates to the same assessee and the similar contentions are advanced as regards to setting aside of the impugned orders, all the writ petitions are taken up together and disposed off by this common order. 2.Petitioner submits that he is the registered supplier under the Goods and Service Tax Regime and is involved in export of service. It is further submitted that the petitioner had paid IGST, but in light of his entitlement to claim refund on the ground of zero-rated supply, petitioner had sought for refund of the IGST paid by hi....