^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ASHOKE MUKHERJEE vs. THE COMMISSIONER, WBGST & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Pet. Counsel

Amrita Pandey

Sneha Singh

Bipasha Jaiswal

Res. Counsel

Anirban Ray

T.m.siddiqui

Tanoy Chakraborty

Petitioner / Applicant	ASHOKE MUKHERJEE
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER, WBGST & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	May 13, 2024
Order No.	W. P. A. 11060 of 2024
Citation	2024(5) TAXREPLY 9777
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
1. The present writ application has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner under the WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), effected vide order dated 28th September, 2022. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that originally a show cause notice for cancellation of registration of the certificate issued under the said Act was issued on 23rd August 2022. According to the petitioner by reasons of oversight, the petitioner could not file his response to the show cause which ultimately resulted in the order dated 28th September, 2022 being issued. 3. Ms. Pandey learned advocate appearing for the petitioner by drawing attention of this Court to page 30 of the writ petition submits that the petitioner, immediately upon coming to learn with regard to cancellation of the registration, had filed an application, inter alia, praying for revocation of the order of cancellation. In pursuance to the ....