^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND CX, RANGE-I & OTHERS
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Pet. Counsel

Sandip Choraria

Rishav Manna

Res. Counsel

Uday Shankar Bhattacharya

Tapan Bhanja

Petitioner / Applicant	ASHOK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondent	SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND CX, RANGE-I & OTHERS
Court	Calcutta High Court
State	West Bengal
Date	Sep 24, 2024
Order No.	WPA 20435 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11941
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner dated 2nd March, 2023, passed under the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 2. It is the petitioner’s case that on or about 14th January, 2023, the petitioner was served with a show cause as to why the registration of the petitioner under the said Act shall not be cancelled for the petitioner having failed to file his returns for a continuous period of six months. 3. Mr. Choraria, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was and is all along interested to comply with the provisions of the said Act unfortunately by reasons of his failure to file appropriate response, the aforesaid fact could not be brought to the notice of respondents. 4. By placing reliance on a judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court del....