^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ARUN MEDICALS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, MECHERI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

S.satheesh Kumar

Res. Counsel

C.harsha Raj

Petitioner / Applicant	ARUN MEDICALS
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST) , THE MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, MECHERI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 23, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 28035 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 30586 & 30587 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11153
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 29.12.2023 along with the consequential GST DRC-13 dated 19.06.2024 notice for attachment of Bank Account passed by the first respondent for the assessment year 2017-2018. 2. Mr.C.Harsha Raj, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. 3. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the time of admission stage itself. 4. Alleging that there is a mismatch of tax liability between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A filed by the petitioner for the assessment year 2017-2018, the respondent passed an impugned order dated 29.12.2023, demanding the payment of differential amount in respect of the impugned assessment period. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a show cause notice raised on the petitioner in the GST common portal, stating that there is a mismatch of tax liability filed by the petitioner for....