^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

ARPIT AGARWAL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
MANJIVE SHUKLA JJ

Pet. Counsel

Abhinav Mehrotra

Satya Vrata Mehrotra

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	ARPIT AGARWAL
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Sep 18, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 1386 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11013
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 28.04.2024 issued by the respondent no.2 [Annexure No.9] as well notices dated 16.12.2023/19.12.2023, 23.04.2024 [Annexure Nos.5 & 6] to the writ petition and the corresponding tax liability including the connected demand for penalty and interest. (b) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (c) Award costs in favour of the petitioner." 2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perused the materials on record. 3. The factual matrix of the present case reveals that there is a partnership firm consisted of two partners one Mr. Arvind Jain and other Mr. A....